Solar Panel Maker Moves Work to China

Aided by at least $43 million in assistance from the government of Massachusetts and an innovative solar energy technology, Evergreen Solar emerged in the last three years as the third-largest maker of solar panels in the United States. Full Story »

Posted by Lynn Caporale - via NewsRack (Energy), New York Times (Most Emailed), NewsRack (Business), Google News (China), Columbia Journalism Review, Patrick McDermott (t), Steve Murray (t), Wil Kristin (t), Lynnette Fusilier (t), Ish Harshawat (t), miker1717 (t), Jason Samfield (t), urmi das (t), Peter Avalos (t), Jon Mitchell (t), Ray Nichols (t), Jeremy Caplan (t), George Moga (t), David Fox (f)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Business, Sci/Tech
Member Tags: Low interest loans
Stats Help
# Diggs: 31 (as of 2011-01-16)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Lynn Caporale - Jan 14, 2011 - 6:15 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Jan 15, 2011 - 12:59 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jonathan Brough
2.5
by Jonathan Brough - Jan. 15, 2011

More context could be given by discussing Chinese stimulus initiatives and the amounts of funding involved, their growth in renewables especially hydro electric and their aims to improve R&D. No Chinese industry or government officials are sourced. Some analysis of the Obama administration's efforts concerning renwables would also be warranted, as would the reason regulators are settling on National grid price levels.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Lynn Caporale
3.9
by Lynn Caporale - Jan. 16, 2011

This may be a story about a specific event, one factory closing, laying off 800 people, and moving production to China, but it points to a much larger story.

China’s real advantage lies in the ability of solar panel companies to form partnerships with local governments and then obtain loans at very low interest rates from ... More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 3 reviews (32% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.3
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!