Tea party in the Sonora: For the future of G.O.P. governance, look to Arizona

The general unsightliness of the capitol makes it a fitting home for today’s Arizona legislature, which is composed almost entirely of dimwits, racists, and cranks. Collectively they have bankrupted the state through a combination of ideological fanaticism on the Republican right and acquiescence and timidity on the part of G.O.P. moderates and Democrats. Although dozens of states are facing budget crises, the situation in Arizona is arguably the ... Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie - via Harper's, mckarthy diahn (t), Mark Horn (t)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 1 (as of 2011-01-12)
# Tweets: 38 (as of 2011-01-09)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Jan 9, 2011 - 4:03 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Ellie Kesselman - Jan 16, 2011 - 7:12 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jim Lang
3.7
by Jim Lang - Jan. 11, 2011

This is an article that presents a lot of data but is written like a hatchet job -- which leads me to view the data skeptically.

This article appeals to and agrees with all my prejudices. That always sets off my alarm gong. I thought that it was a fun read but I wouldn't rely on it for accuracy or quote it as a source.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Fred Gatlin
4.1
by Fred Gatlin - Jan. 10, 2011

This is a good article. It is through and well written. It likely applies to many other states.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Walter Cox
3.5
by Walter Cox - Jan. 11, 2011

This article accurately represents what happens when ideology rules and the leaders of a state become incapable of rational, independent governance. Where the article fails is when it falls into name-calling: "The general unsightliness of the capitol makes it a fitting home for today’s Arizona legislature, which is composed almost entirely of dimwits, racists, and cranks." This one sentence guarantees that only those who agree with the author's ad hominem characterization will continue reading, which is a shame. Whether we are talking rightist ideologues or leftist ideologues, neither mind-set is productive of governmental policies that actually work.

I understand now why my father moved to Arizona and why, when he visits California, he is so resolutely obstreperous.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Warrior Wheatman
4.0
by Warrior Wheatman - Jul. 18, 2011

Because of the opinionated denegrative byline, I had avoided reading this article. But now, due to an ideological clash between two reviewers, I am pleasantly surprised by an extremely well written (albeit biased) overview of Arizona politics.

Mr. Ken Silverstein seems to have predicted the current debt debate debacle. His take on the Tea Party remains unresolved.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.7
by Chris Finnie - Jan. 10, 2011

Though I ranked this as an opinion piece because the author does express strong feelings, it also contains a lot of facts to back them up. Well written and informative. Scary too.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Patricia Blochowiak
4.6
by Patricia Blochowiak - Jul. 18, 2011

If this story didn't contain so much biased language, it would be an outstanding story. As it is, it's very good, but only if the reader agrees with, or can ignore, the biases expressed at the beginning.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Mike Carlson
4.0
by Mike Carlson - Jan. 11, 2011

As an AZ resident I can attest that Mr. Silverstein has all his facts right. This is a state where HOA board members are killed because angry whites want their country back. Magical thinking and brain frozen officials are preferred over rational, problem oriented decision making.

See Full Review » (3 answers)
Priscilla L. Davis
4.8
by Priscilla L. Davis - Jan. 13, 2011

This is a well -written and thought provoking article, a good piece of journalism. It covers the spectrum on Arizona's economic and political realities in a well documented analysis of both.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Ellie Kesselman
2.0
by Ellie Kesselman - Jan. 16, 2011

First, note that this article was written in July 2010, not January 2011 as indicated in the information section. The metadata in the URL confirms this. Secondly, the article condemns not only the government of the State of Arizona, but the history and entire populace as well. And there are numerous inaccuracies. I know this because I am a former employee of the State of Arizona Department of Health Services, furloughed since March 2009. I am a resident of the State of Arizona at present. This article, despite being an opinion piece, is so biased that perhaps I should consider myself as having a conflict of interest merely by living in the state.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.0
by Roland F. Hirsch - Jan. 12, 2011

This opinion piece has no journalistic merit. The author is totally consumed with hatred of people who disagree with him. His religious bigotry is also notable: most people even on the left do not hate Mormons at all, while this person conspicuously does hate them. Not clear why this way out of date piece from a far-left magazine was posted on NewsTrust.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 13 reviews (56% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
3.3
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.9
Insight
3.8
Style
3.3
Accuracy
3.3
Balance
2.7
Context
3.3
Depth
3.7
Enterprise
3.7
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.5
Relevance
3.8
Transparency
2.7
Responsibility
2.9
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!