Editorial - Age Discrimination - NYTimes.com

The Supreme Court rewrote the rules for litigating age-discrimination cases in favor of employers. It falls to Congress to undo the damage. Full Story »

Posted by Samuel W. Velsor IV - via New York Times (Opinion), New York Times (Editorials)

See All Reviews »

Review

Samuel W.  Velsor IV
4.7
by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Jul. 8, 2009

A most important item of news revealing a grossest error of the Roberts' Supreme Court.

That employees now will have the burden of proof in age discrimination cases is just totally wrong of the Supreme court to have "Written Law" again; Congress must now act to correct this travisty of injustice. Glad to see that Senator Patrick Leahy, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, agrees.

See All Reviews »

Samuel's Rating

Overall
4.7

Very good
from 16 answers
Quality
4.7
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »