Incoherent rant claiming that 'reverse racism' allowed a white couple from Virginia to crash the White House State Dinner. The author offers little substance to back her points, which don't make much sense in the first place, and seem irresponsible to me. A textbook example of bad journalism.

This piece is slightly incoherent, and not well thought out. There seems to be an argument that racial profiling worked against the security of the President, but there's no concrete evidence is offered that the SS utilized racial profiling in securing the state dinner. Much more interesting is the linked piece explaining what law the couple could be charged with violating (Thanks Umbreen).

This opinion piece clearly demonstrates one thing--in contemporary America almost any event can be turned into an example of racism. The author plays the race card shamelessly, and her outrage at "white privilege" is palpable; her attitude nullifies any journalistic merit this story might otherwise have.

Blames racism as a root cause of a problem rather than treating it as a contributing factor. When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail mentality.