The Safety Net: Food Stamp Use Soars Across U.S., and Stigma Fades

A program once scorned as a failed welfare scheme now helps feed one in eight Americans and one in four children. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Google News (Business), New York Times (Most Emailed), Publish2 (U.S.)

See All Reviews »

Review

Samuel W.  Velsor IV
4.0
by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Dec. 2, 2009

Lacking in detail of benefits and requirements. Further the grammar used was often to high-end for an article on social need.

Food stamps is a most misunderstood benefit. There still is abuse on both side of the issue with items that should be covered not covered and vise versa. For the single person benefits do not cover a healthful diet when you add a family you have a huge advantage. I have made several long comments in the QUOTES section.

Nationwide, food stamps reach about two-thirds of those eligible, with rates ranging from an estimated 50 percent in California to 98 percent in Missouri. Mr. Concannon urged lagging states to do more to enroll the needy, citing a recent government report that found a sharp rise in Americans with inconsistent access to adequate food.

Governmental stumbling blocks that are intentional I fear in many locations with income restrictions and worse benefit amounts that for those with no income are not logical — further there are real needs in this century that are not even covered, while on the reverse bottled water should not be covered

The revival was crowned last year with an upbeat change of name. What most people still call food stamps is technically the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.

Question: When did You first know that food stamps were no longer called food stamps, but “SNAP”. I admit that I was unaware of the name changed to a politically correct one.

Almost 90 percent of beneficiaries nationwide live below the poverty line (about $22,000 a year for a family of four). But a minor tempest hit Ohio’s Warren County after a woman drove to the food stamp office in a Mercedes-Benz and word spread that she owned a $300,000 home loan-free. Since Ohio ignores the value of houses and cars, she qualified.

I think the personal property exemption needs to be looked at — people should be required to scale back.

See All Reviews »

Samuel's Rating

Overall
4.0

Good
from 24 answers
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »