To Catch a Tiger

Though it was only a one-day news story in the United States, a momentous event occurred last spring, with worldwide military significance. After 26 years of heavy fighting, the Sri Lankan government decisively defeated an ethnic insurgency, killing all of its top leadership, whose bodies were displayed on national television. Massive victory parades followed. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S.
Topics: War, Asia, Foreign Policy
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Jul 1, 2009 - 9:05 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Jul 1, 2009 - 9:05 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Walter Cox
3.7
by Walter Cox - Jul. 1, 2009

Disturbing and incisive. If America wants to stay great, it must stay good (to paraphrase De Tocqueville); yet that may mean having to accept non-victory (as opposed to defeat) in some battles.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Ben Ross
2.8
by Ben Ross - Jul. 6, 2009

sudo liberal take on what not to do to an insurgency. Kaplan does not mention any differences between " Tamil Tigers" and " Afganistan" insurgents. What is the reason the US military is making war in the middle east and Asia? This over arching question is not considered.

One of big medias biggest stumbling blocks is an absence of neutrality. Major social/ government/military issues are complicated. Myopic cheerleading for the players by size ...(giant : thus legitimate) is not helping.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Information
3.0
Insight
2.5
Style
3.5
Context
3.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!