Co-Op Option Offers Compromise In Health Debate

(Audio - streaming) A new health insurance idea is circulating through the Senate Finance Committee and may appear in its final plan for revamping the nation's health care system. The idea is to stimulate the creation of co-ops where people could go to buy low-cost, high-quality health insurance.

Health co-ops are not a new idea. Two large ones, Group Health in Seattle and HealthPartners in Minneapolis, are more than 50 years old. But the thought that co-ops could ... Full Story »

Posted by Kristin Gorski
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Health
Topics: Health Care
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kristin Gorski - Jul 1, 2009 - 7:13 AM PDT
Content Type: Audio - streaming
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kristin Gorski - Jul 1, 2009 - 7:13 AM PDT
Derek Hawkins
3.9
by Derek Hawkins - Jul. 2, 2009

The idea of stimulating health co-ops has been under the radar in the current health care debate. NPR does a fine job in this segment reporting on the potential benefits of co-ops while also seeking comment from skeptics of the system.

Reading some of the opposition's views here I'm even more amazed than usual at how far conservatives and libertarians will over-exaggerate the "personal choice" argument to defend big insurers and prescription drug companies. A lot of their claims, to me, border on hyperbole.

Current CEO Mary Brainerd says she’s very aware of whom she works for. “It’s really clear to me whose interests I ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Paul Belle-Isle
2.8
by Paul Belle-Isle - Jul. 2, 2009

This is probably the most in-depth examination of the healthcare co-ops proposed by Senator Kent Conrad that I have encountered to date. Unfortunately, this depth is reached narrowly, and neither effectively places the co-ops in broader context, nor addresses the main criticism of them: namely that only in rare occasions will they ever achieve the membership numbers needed for effective bargaining power.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kristin Gorski
3.7
by Kristin Gorski - Jul. 1, 2009

An interesting report about health co-ops, which are just recently being promoted as another alternative in Congressional efforts to reform health care. The article looks at a couple of co-ops as examples, but would benefit from wider-reaching statistics and context. What kind of nation-wide impact would including co-ops have? Many positive aspects are mentioned, but not enough negatives are provided to balance the information. My curiosity has been piqued, but I'm left with unanswered questions.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.9
by Fred Gatlin - Jul. 2, 2009

Coops have existed in rural areas for more than 100 years. When Blue Cross/Blue Shield began they were mutual insurance companies, which were owned by those who buy insurance. Part of the problem of our current system is for profit providers.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
2.2
by Dwight Rousu - Jul. 2, 2009

It is short and superficial on a subject requiring depth, and creates a misleading warm fuzzy feeling. Critical shortcomings of co-ops as a solution for national health care are not examined. Negative views given are only dogmatic libertarian constructs.

The Group Health co-op here in Seattle has both fans and detractors. Doctor and hospital choices are limited and not always the closest. A local co-op is too small and financially constrained to meaningfully compete financially with nationwide insurance oligopolies if they choose to compete. College children could well be outside the coverage area. It cost more than other plan options at work, so I did not choose it due to cost and inconvenience. They have to cost-ration care for ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Peter Henry
2.1
by Peter Henry - Jul. 7, 2009

Very superficial view of health coops presented by NPR as an alternative to the "public option" - a large public health care provider to compete with large health providers and insurance companies. Interviews a customer and one or two people who work for a Minnesota coop. In the spirit of "balanced reporting" NPR presents a Republican's viewpoint and a free-market opponent. No point at all from the 60% of Americans who want viable public provided health care. The elephant in the tent, which mainstream media ignores - including NPR - is what would really promote competition is a government program big enough to force the insurance companies' hands.

NPR is such an inside-the-beltway organization, they make up their minds what the acceptable parameters are before they even do the story. Pretty far from an independent news organization.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Jul. 1, 2009

Interesting radio segment about the health co-op initiative being proposed by Sen. Kent Conrad in Congress. Factual, fair and well sourced, with useful context.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Naomi Isler
4.0
by Naomi Isler - Jul. 1, 2009

This broadcast tries to better define the co op option in health care reform, and puts positive spin on them as possibilities to counter insurance companies. However, it leaves out some information - could they be interstate, or how many could there be more than one operating in the same area, e.g. And it doesn't address the issue of how much they reduce costs.

The more I hear, the more I think that revising the payment structure is crucial to reducing costs.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jay Baulikki
3.7
by Jay Baulikki - Jul. 1, 2009

I really hope we all do not have to pay for everyone else.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.4
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
2.7
Style
3.3
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.3
Depth
2.9
Enterprise
2.7
Expertise
3.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • About Group Health (Seattle Co-op) Pending

    Posted by Dwight Rousu
  • No Compromise on the Public Plan!: Why Weakening the Public Option Would Weaken the Party Responsible

    Why are all the alternatives to a robust public plan now being floated in the health care reform debate – cooperatives, state or regional plans, a “trigger” for the ...
  • Why the Critics of a Public Option for Health Care Are Wrong

    (Blog Post) Without a public option, the other parties that comprise America's non-system of health care -- private insurers, doctors, hospitals, drug companies, and medical suppliers -- ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala