No Compromise on the Public Plan!: Why Weakening the Public Option Would Weaken the Party Responsible

Why are all the alternatives to a robust public plan now being floated in the health care reform debate – cooperatives, state or regional plans, a “trigger” for the public plan, a public plan prohibited from bargaining with drug companies – such profoundly bad ideas?
For one simple reason: they would fail to rein in health care costs’ out-of-control growth rate. Full Story »

Posted by Patricia Blochowiak

See All Reviews »

Review

Patricia L'Herrou
4.4
by Patricia L'Herrou - Aug. 3, 2009

i haven't read the previous notes from the writer, and what's lacking for me here are more expert sources to support his arguments. those are well reasoned and appear financially appropriate to what we know about competition and about health insurers/insurance.

i wish voters would contact congresspersons to let them know how vital these arguments are for achieving any health care reform which actually is reform

See All Reviews »

Patricia's Rating

Overall
4.4

Good
from 10 answers
Quality
4.2
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
More How our ratings work »