Rather an incoherent opinion piece with barely sustainable logic--especially since those Americans who define themselves as "conservative" are more numerous than any other ideological/political group (please see link). The author seems to miss that fact that most conservatives were quite disappointed with George W. Bush's LACK of fiscal conservatism, and they also disapproved of many of his policies. And, has he ever heard of progressive conservatism? Yes, I know,liberals have claimed the term "progressive" as uniquely their own, but that doesn't make it so.

This is quality journalism. Mr. Pitts offers us a thoughtful analysis of what does and does not qualify as hateful oppression and who does and does not qualify for the status of victim. His quintessential summary of failed conservatism is trenchant. I highly recommend this example of fine, judicious writing.

Pitts provides some insight into victimhood and faux outrage.