Should We Laugh? Cry? Both?

(Blog Post) The ritual is becoming familiar. Health care reform passes a major political hurdle. And progressives don?t know whether to laugh or cry. Last time, the occasion was a vote in the House of Representatives. Health care reform passed by the slimmest of margins, but not before conservative Democrats had extracted a major concession on abortion rights. This time, it was a vote in the Senate--not on whether to pass a bill, but whether to begin debating one. ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Jonathan Cohn, NewsRack (Health Care)

See All Reviews »

Review

Derek Hawkins
3.4
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 23, 2009

But the public option fight—however it turns out—could also help progressives in other ways. Whether out of pique, politics, or principle, Lieberman, Lincoln, and Nelson (and maybe one or two others) want to scream about something—and to have a concession they can claim as their own. If they end up demanding the public option as the price of their support—and I’m not saying I want that to happen—perhaps the rest of the bill can go through relatively unscathed. Or, to put it more starkly, if they didn’t have the public option to attack then it’d be the subsidies, or the price tag, or the insurance regulations. Merely by including the public option in his bill, Reid has increased the chances that the final bill is a good one—even if the public option is gone by the time deliberations are done.

See All Reviews »

Derek's Rating

Overall
3.4

Average
from 10 answers
Quality
3.4
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »