Wishful thinking from Tehran

Since the revolution, academics and pundits have predicted the collapse of the Iranian regime. This week, they did no better

Iran is a deeply religious society. Of the Shah's mistakes nepotism, autocracy, and repression were fought by communists and liberals for decades with no success, but it was his attack on the religious establishment that led to his almost overnight demise. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: Iran
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jun 15, 2009 - 10:48 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Jun 15, 2009 - 10:48 AM PDT
Derek Hawkins
3.9
by Derek Hawkins - Jun. 15, 2009

Doesn't offer much in the way of data, but does an exceptional job explaining the cultural attitudes in Iran that would suggest an Ahmadinejad victory. For decades, Barzegar argues, Western media have underestimated the piousness of a large portion of the Iranian population, and this has affected their coverage of Moussavi's likely loss.

“How did Mousavi lose?” seems to be less a problem of the Iranian election commission and more a matter of bad perception rooted in the stubborn refusal to ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Dan Kennedy
4.2
by Dan Kennedy - Jun. 15, 2009

No numbers, so no proof that the Iranian election was or wasn't stolen. But Barzegar explains the context in which Ahmedinejad could have won in a provocative and compelling way.

Not sure whether this qualifies as a conflict, but I am a paid contributor to the Guardian.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Jun. 15, 2009

Thoughtful perspective from a PHD candidate at Emory University in Atlanta, commenting from Iran about the recent election. He points to factual evidence to suggest that most Iranians expected Ahmedinejad to win, and tries to understand why the global news media and Mousavi supporters are so stunned by the election's outcome. Well reasoned commentary.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.6
by Kaizar Campwala - Jun. 15, 2009

This is a highly recommended opinion piece. Barzegar points out a history of the west not understanding the dynamics of the Iranian polity. He claims that western observers miss the deeply religious nature of the Iranian people, and the attraction of Ahmedinejad as a corruption fighting everyman.

Of course, the rather real possibility of voter fraud exists and one must wait in the coming weeks to see how these allegations unfold. But one should recall that in three ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Joey Baker
4.3
by Joey Baker - Jun. 15, 2009

Solid opinion piece from a gent who knows a lot about Iran, and is actually on the ground there.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
William Owney
4.5
by William Owney - Jun. 16, 2009

Long duree. The writer articulates a useful context born of an in-depth comprehension of the social structures at play. This is so much more than the thin veneer that characterizes much of contemporary reportage.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Information
4.0
Insight
4.5
Style
4.2
Context
4.2
Expertise
2.8
Originality
4.4
Relevance
4.5
Responsibility
4.2
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!