Mourning a Scourge of the Comfortable

When an investigative reporter passes on it’s not just the family that suffers. Full Story »

Posted by Linda Pilgrim
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Linda Pilgrim - Jun 6, 2009 - 1:57 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Linda Pilgrim - Jun 6, 2009 - 1:57 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Linda Pilgrim
4.8
by Linda Pilgrim - Jun. 6, 2009

Written by a veteran, well-respected reporter. He has written an obituary of a fellow journalist and framed his story within the larger context of the dying field of journalism as-we-have-known it, until today.

The death of the printed newspaper does not have to result in the death of quality journalism. The paper is just a medium. The medium must now change--due to the realities of changes in society, technology, economics and the environment. The business model must now change too. As soon as the mourning process is complete, let's channel that energy to accepting reality and embracing change and developing new business models, new venues for quality journalism. It will live on as long as ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
5.0
by Kenneth Sibbett - Jun. 7, 2009

A 5.0. From me. To a journalist. No way, Jose. If a profession has to die, and I think they are burying it way to soon, you can't go out on a higher note.

A journalist is an integral part of society. They find the people who steal our money. That's basically what they do. I know, they cover wars, etc, but there's money there too.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
2.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Jun. 10, 2009

This is a hard piece the rate, but I see little value in it. Yet another journalist romanticizing their profession, as if journalists have been wronged. Journalist do important work - yes. But spending too much energy romanticizing the past doesn't serve the public they profess to serve.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Information
3.7
Insight
4.0
Style
4.3
Context
5.0
Expertise
5.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!