This editorial opines that a debate on health insurance approaches is necessary and then praises Bush's proposal as a free market approach with clear but unsourced benefits. Editorials often are not well sourced but in an area like this where the "facts" are not easily observed or well known and prejudices are rampant, it is difficult to differentiate between reality and spin.

This is a conservative viewpoint, but it clarifies Bush's healthcare proposal.

This is a predictable op-ed from the Wall Street Journal. It is very biased, contains one weak comment from the other side, and has few legitimate figures other than what the Administration spoon fed it. This is indicative of the reporting quality that leads me to rate this paper very low on trust and general quality.

Strong opinion backed by facts and analysis. Well crafted.