Amnesty: Human Rights Traded for Security

Associated Press, Newsday by Danika Kirka, AP | May. 23, 2006 (News Report)

The relentless pursuit of security by the world's powerful nations had undermined human rights, draining energy and attention from crises afflicting the poor and underprivileged Full Story »

Posted by Tori H.

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: Human Rights, Terrorism
Member Tags: Darfur, Guantanamo, Irene Khan, guantanamo bay
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 1
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Opinions as factsHelp: 2
Number stakeholdersHelp: 1
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 1
Derogatory wordsHelp: 7-9
Complimentary wordsHelp: 2
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Tori H. - May 23, 2006 - 9:29 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Tori H. (review), Richard M. Mathews (review), Mike Carlson (review), Roseann Erwin (review), Oh Urs (review), Rod Amis (review), Fabrice Florin (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Ezra Fox - Aug 24, 2006 - 8:33 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Roseann Erwin
2.1
 by Roseann Erwin - Jul. 2, 2011
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Mike Carlson
2.6
 by Mike Carlson - Oct. 1, 2008

A friendly review f Amnesty International's condemnation of U.S. obsession with terrorism and 9-11 vengence.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Richard M. Mathews
2.3
 by Richard M. Mathews - Oct. 1, 2008

AP largely worked an AI press release into an article. There is no opposing viewpoint presented.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Rod Amis
2.9
 by Rod Amis - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Tori H.
4.0
 by Tori H. - Oct. 1, 2008
Tori posted this story.
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Oh Urs
4.0
 by Oh Urs - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.5
 by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

Average
from 7 reviews (47% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Fairness
2.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.2
Context
2.8
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
2.9
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!