Is It Time for Malpractice Reform?

Detroit sells its Silverdome for less than a one-bedroom apartment, Goldman Sachs reports huge profits, and three congressmen warn New Yorkers of terrorism.

Year after year, Republicans try to pass legislation that would limit medical malpractice awards. Fix the tort system, they argue, and we fix rising health-care costs. And year after year, Democrats resist placing arbitrary caps on awards to people who may have suffered from an egregious medical error. The fight plays out like a predictable old Western -- good guys versus bad guys. Depending on your politics, the villain is either the greedy doctor or the ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via NewsRack (Health Care)

See All Reviews »

Review

Kaizar Campwala
3.6
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 22, 2009

Health-care reform is about more than covering more Americans and controlling costs. It’s also about quality. Repairing health care requires “delivery-system reform” — moving away from inefficient and inconsistent care and toward more coordinated, value-driven medicine. But it’s hard to get doctors enthused about adopting a “less is more” approach if they fear lawsuits from patients who think less is simply less and believe they have an inalienable right to more and more. More CT scans. More back surgeries. Even more colonoscopies. Overtreatment has many causes — the idiosyncrasies of a physician’s training, local practice patterns, the doctor’s bottom line. But many experts believe that limiting “defensive” medicine, which is notoriously hard to quantify, would at least remove one barrier to fixing the broken system. Economists may believe that “defensive medicine” is less of a problem than doctors do. But it’s the doctors that have to accept the new care models —and get their patients to follow.

See All Reviews »

Kaizar's Rating

Overall
3.6

Good
from 6 answers
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »