Article draws what seems on the surface to be a reasonable conclusion even if from just one incident....but it leaves me wondering whether the interrogator was bravely entering into a courageous conversation that few people are willing to have....or was just revealing a deep and blatant bias. A little more context would improve it...for instance, what has been the legal stance on such questioning...and when were such rulings compared to when the incident happened. Simple style...a quick read... I appreciate having the information...it does help understand who Sotomayor is as a person. It does not help me understand Martin Krall.