North Korean blast smaller than thought

The yield is about four kilotonnes equivalent of TNT, with an uncertainty range from three to eight kilotonnes," Martin Kalinowski, a professor at the Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker Centre for Science and Peace Research (ZNF), at the University of Hamburg, told AFP. Full Story »

Posted by Glenn LaBauve
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Glenn LaBauve - May 26, 2009 - 9:20 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Glenn LaBauve (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Glenn LaBauve - May 26, 2009 - 9:20 AM PDT
Glenn LaBauve
4.2
by Glenn LaBauve - May. 26, 2009

As with any breaking story reveification of the facts is extremenly important. This story gives a lot of scientific background explaination.

The lower yield in no lessen the impact of this test. While a larger yield would have shown a better mastery of the art of atomic weaponry, it was none the less an implosion type weapon most likely which is step one of a thermonuclear weapon. It is likely they are haveing enhancement problems at this time and we can expect several more tests until they correct the problem. We should not forget the Indian ocean test in the 1970s where no nation claimed resonsibility. As long as NK ... More »

I don’t know how the Russians arrived at their high estimate," he said. “I haven’t seen any technical evidence as to how they calculated this yield, ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

not enough reviews
from 1 review (10% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!