Is University of Missouri's iPod Touch 'Requirement' Fair?

But the "requirement" wasn't really a "requirement," if you read further into the Missourian article:

The requirement will not be enforced, however, and there will not be a penalty for students who chose not to buy an iPod touch or iPhone, [Associate Dean Brian] Brooks said.

"The reason we put 'required' on it is to help the students on financial need," Brooks said. "If it's required, it can be included in your financial need estimate. If ... Full Story »

Posted by Joey Baker

See All Reviews »

Review

Derek Hawkins
3.2
by Derek Hawkins - May. 21, 2009

This story captures an interesting debate, though it's probably not very relevant to some readers. Sourcing is even-handed, as is the author's own analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of having J-students purchase the iPod Touch. But I was amazed to see that there was no information about the university's relationship with Apple! Nor was there any discussion of the benefits or drawbacks of incorporating the Touch in the curriculum outside the university's pitch and weak arguments about cost. Same goes for the Maneater story, if you read that link.

This was a great issue for both MediaShift and the Maneater to cover, but they both let the meatier aspects of the story untouched. Shame on them. The only "sides" presented here revolve around marketing quotes from the university and knee-jerk reaction from students, who, in my experience as a student-journalist, tend to throw a fit any time they're presented with a new expense, even though it'll probably go on their parents' tab.

See All Reviews »

Derek's Rating

Overall
3.2

Average
from 12 answers
Quality
3.1
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Style
2.0
Context
3.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »