Is University of Missouri's iPod Touch 'Requirement' Fair?

But the "requirement" wasn't really a "requirement," if you read further into the Missourian article:

The requirement will not be enforced, however, and there will not be a penalty for students who chose not to buy an iPod touch or iPhone, [Associate Dean Brian] Brooks said.

"The reason we put 'required' on it is to help the students on financial need," Brooks said. "If it's required, it can be included in your financial need estimate. If ... Full Story »

Posted by Joey Baker
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Joey Baker - May 20, 2009 - 8:30 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - May 21, 2009 - 6:21 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.2
by Derek Hawkins - May. 21, 2009

This story captures an interesting debate, though it's probably not very relevant to some readers. Sourcing is even-handed, as is the author's own analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of having J-students purchase the iPod Touch. But I was amazed to see that there was no information about the university's relationship with Apple! Nor was there any discussion of the benefits or drawbacks of incorporating the Touch in the curriculum outside the university's pitch and weak arguments about cost. Same goes for the Maneater story, if you read that link.

This was a great issue for both MediaShift and the Maneater to cover, but they both let the meatier aspects of the story untouched. Shame on them. The only "sides" presented here revolve around marketing quotes from the university and knee-jerk reaction from students, who, in my experience as a student-journalist, tend to throw a fit any time they're presented with a new expense, even though it'll probably go on their parents' tab.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Joey Baker
4.3
by Joey Baker - May. 20, 2009

Bryan has done an excellent job quoting articles, talking to people involved and presenting the whole story. He even includes a pro/co list

It's a controversial move mostly because of cost and not knowing what the tool will be used for. I argue that the tool should be put in the student's hands. Uses will appear.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.4
by Kaizar Campwala - May. 21, 2009

This is an interesting article conceptually, and it's certainly well-researched. However, it fails to get to find good evidence on the actual value created by teaching with iPods, or explore whether there are other, non-academic interests involved in pushing students to make these purchases. What's the relationship between Apple and the universities, for example?

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Information
3.7
Insight
3.3
Style
3.3
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.7
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
3.3
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!