Judge: Hurricane Katrina Flooding Was Caused By Army Corps Of Engineers' Negligence

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Army Corps of Engineers' failure to properly maintain a navigation channel led to massive flooding in Hurricane Katrina, a decision that could make the federal government vulnerable to billions of dollars in claims. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via Google Blogsearch (World), Google Blogsearch (Politics)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S.
Member Tags: new orleans
Stats Help
# Tweets: 39 (as of 2009-11-18)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Nov 18, 2009 - 9:49 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Nov 18, 2009 - 10:38 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
3.4
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 18, 2009

Competent report of a court ruling that may have many implications for New Orleans.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
William Hughes-Games
1.6
by William Hughes-Games - Nov. 19, 2009

Missing the real point

Flooding was caused by a decision long ago to allow people to settle on the flood plain rather than just having fields which would benefit from the periodic addition of silt. The best thing the government could do would be to remove all the houses from the area which was flooded. Allow silt laden water from the Mississippi to flow through the area creating a lovely lake and adding layer upon layer of silt as the water slows down.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Sydney LaCour
4.7
by Sydney LaCour - Nov. 19, 2009

I find it interesting that this issue is being resolved over four years after the disaster that was Hurricane Katrina. The people of Southern Louisiana dealt with a loss that is hard to compare to any disaster. More information needs to come forward about this issue so that the victims of Katrina can finally gain some justice.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.1

Average
from 4 reviews (34% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!