Tax cuts in black and white

In the complex debate over the Bush-era tax cuts, both parties are guilty of shading the truth. Full Story »

Posted by Joey Baker
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 18 (as of 2010-11-30)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Joey Baker - Nov 30, 2010 - 6:44 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Joey Baker - Nov 30, 2010 - 6:46 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jon Mitchell
3.7
by Jon Mitchell - Dec. 1, 2010

It's a noble effort, meticulously comparing partisan claims to those of independent experts. I think it does a decent job; although none of the points are thoroughly examined, the authors take a few sentences after each politician's statement to review its factual claims.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Joey Baker
3.5
by Joey Baker - Nov. 30, 2010

Goes out of it's way to be balanced, and present both sides of the argument, but doesn't bother to examine who is actually right, what a proper course of action might look like, or how a compromise might be reached.

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.1
by Fred Gatlin - Nov. 30, 2010

This is an extremely limited facts check. Regardless of this issue there are problems with the tax code. It seems both parties are not prepared to look closely at the tax code and without resolving this and several other tax issues prior to the end of the year estate taxes, alternative tax issues and many other issues will go back to permanent law. Then the public will scream loudly.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Chris Finnie
3.4
by Chris Finnie - Dec. 1, 2010

I always appreciate journalists that fact-check politicians. And this article, though I found the call-and-response format distracting, did that. I would have found it more valuable and well-rounded if it had also checked whether any of these claims are true. For example, do any of these cuts help create jobs or stimulate the economy?

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Walaika Haskins
3.8
by Walaika Haskins - Dec. 1, 2010

This is a very well-written and sourced article. It raises issues that many media outlets have not during the course of the Bush tax renewal debate.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Tavison
2.7
by Tavison - Dec. 1, 2010

"Tax Cuts in Black and White" should have been called "Tax Cuts: He Said, She Said" "As the Brookings Institution’s Bill Gale has pointed out, the budget deficit stood at 1.2 percent of annual gross domestic product as recently as 2007, long after the Bush tax cuts had taken effect, and have ballooned to 10 percent of GDP now." - Well of course. Fractions have a denominator! This article suffers from the typical problem of even criticism of the right and the left. Trying to argue ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 7 reviews (56% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.6
Information
4.0
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
3.2
Style
3.7
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.8
Enterprise
2.8
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.8
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!