Apparently the authors claim that anyone not agreeing with their venom is prejudiced in some way. Freedom of speech allows one to voice their opinion. It does not insure that anyone cares to listen.

The story gives no example of the specific articles which goodle handled as "Hate Speech". On one of the articles hyper-links to "The New Media Journal.us" I did see a reference to 3 urls noted in Googles response. After reading this trash at those urls, I concur with Google.

Controversial report on alleged censorship by Google News. The author has methodically collected detailed evidence from conservative sources to support his case, and yet makes no attempt to get Google to respond, or to present other viewpoints. There is no attempt either to inquire if left-wing publications have also been affected by Google's new policy The use of derogative language to describe Google's presumed intentions is uncalled for at this stage, turning what could have been a useful news analysis into a thinly-disguised polemic opinion piece. Maybe what Google is reacting to is the hateful mindset that is encouraged by this type of belligerent journalism.

The writer complains about Google banning hate speech, but never gives an example, and never actually denies the articles in question did contain hate speech. Classic misdirection.