Barack Obama's efforts to reform health care

The real battle, over health care, is just beginning

... the real test for Mr Obama is health care, and there momentum appears to be on his side. This week health-care-industry officials promised, at his urging, to cut cost-inflation by 1.5 percentage points a year, or $2 trillion over ten years. The promise was largely meaningless: if $2 trillion in savings was lying around, a profit-maximising industry would have found them. And it remains dead-set against Mr Obama’s wish for a public insurance plan that ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - May 14, 2009 - 7:08 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - May 15, 2009 - 11:49 AM PDT
Chris Finnie
4.3
by Chris Finnie - May. 19, 2009

Though the story doesn't say it, the picture it paints is much like what my state of California is facing already. In short, you cannot accomplish much without the courage to make cuts and raise revenue to finance ambitious programs. There will be some initial pain. We hope for eventual gain. But we will see neither courage nor gain as long as politicians in Congress see their re-election possibly imperiled.

Another thing the Economist does not say is that ag programs were supposed to support family farms--not giant, polluting corporate farms that can't guarantee the safety of our food. Corporations used to pay 70% of our national revenues. Now you and I do. Polluting industries are destroying our planet. But politicians are, as one observed recently, owned by the very industries they're supposed to regulate. As President Eisenhower warned, our government is very broken.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Vincent Caminiti
4.0
by Vincent Caminiti - May. 19, 2009

This is a much more comprehensive look at the debate over health care, and the story, while at a very high altitude, is discussing this in terms of the reality of working through it in Congress. It also puts the discussion in context. There was a significant amount of (high altitude) detail that is regularly edited out / or left out of much of the MSM reports on health care. While other articles seem to focus on the personage creating obstacles - this addressed that issues that are obstacles. All in all this delivered on the title and sub-titleand leaves the reader interested in the follow-ups.

Much of the alleged reporting on this issue has been commentary that addresses party politics, often peppered with quotes from the 'usual suspects' , ideologues and polarizing personalities. The actuality of moving through this mine-field on the other hand, is quite different from talking about it. We've truly, just begun.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Joel Kulenkamp
4.3
by Joel Kulenkamp - May. 19, 2009

I'm a bit concerned about the relevance of cap-and-trade, but otherwise, the article's okay.

Mr Obama has taken flak for talking about sacrifice but not asking for any. On May 7th he responded by listing $17 billion in cuts to programmes deemed inefficient or ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dwight Rousu
2.8
by Dwight Rousu - May. 19, 2009

The story rambles quickly over a lot of territory and then lands on health care. The core problem of insurance corporations controlling congress to prevent the consideration of single payer is not addressed.

If the public financed elections instead of corporations, better and cheaper bills could get passed.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.1
Fairness
3.9
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.1
Depth
3.4
Enterprise
3.7
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.1
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!