Baucus's Raucous Caucus: Doctors, Nurses and Activists Arrested Again for Protesting Exclusion of Single-Payer Advocates at Senate Hearing on Healthcare

On Tuesday, five doctors, nurses and single-payer advocates were arrested at a Senate Finance Committee hearing, bringing the total number of arrests in less than a week to thirteen. We speak with two of those arrested: Single Payer Action founder Russell Mokhiber and Dr. Margaret Flowers of Physicians for a National Health Program. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Health
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - May 13, 2009 - 9:07 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - May 13, 2009 - 9:07 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Vincent Caminiti
4.8
by Vincent Caminiti - May. 14, 2009

This report speaks for itself as to the quality. Mokhiber's comments included an a direct charge that Congress is cavorting with Insurance companies and not in compliance with the wishes of most Americans. This is a bit more revealing when a video, quite fairly edited, reveals the facts that Sen. Baucus is positioning this as hearings on health care when they are symposiums on Health insurance. The report couldn't be more in context or more relevant or more revealing since it is sourced directly from the scene. Amy Goodman continues with unrelenting focus - despite its political inconvenience. The report singularly points out that these hearings are little more than political procedural placating by Baucus because of the ... More »

Senator Baucus has been an overwhelming disappointment in his approach to placating Health Insurance needs with little interest in hearing from health advocates and care-givers. It is clear that this is little more than theater. It is pure obfuscation and shouldn't be tolerated by the electorate.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.3
by Dwight Rousu - May. 13, 2009

The majority opinion of voters and doctors has been excluded from consideration by the congress, and the story presents the public protesting. The drug, insurance, and health care industries are seen as owning politics in Washington.

The huge costs of insurance health care are much greater than the cost of publicly financed elections. And that is just one issue.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Robert B. Elliott
5.0
by Robert B. Elliott - May. 16, 2009

Absolutely, yes. Professional journalists have studied all aspects of the issue & done the necessary homework to provide an accurate & timely report on what is actually taking place & why. Unlike the mainstream infotainment skewered news, difficult questions are addressed and relevant history is not merely ignored for the sake of sensationalism & catering to mass sentiments.

The quote, “the futility of piecemeal tinkering.” kind of says it all. If we dance around these problems & let the self-serving, bottom-line driven corporations retain control, we will get nowhere fast. Single-payer is the only workable alternative that will not take us back to where we were & it is what the people demand. Compromise is good but we've had too much of that & you can't compromise with a rattle snake. Baucus has an obligation to include this viewpoint in the hearings.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Brian Bucknam
4.2
by Brian Bucknam - May. 14, 2009

Interviews combined with clips from the hearing tell a fascinating story of representative democracy being trampled by corporate interests.

If you needed proof that we do not live in a representative democracy, here is a slice of reality.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Doris Vician
4.0
by Doris Vician - May. 19, 2009

Am a supporter of universal single payer and a retired ED nurse.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.3
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.2
Information
3.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.2
Style
3.8
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.5
Expertise
5.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.4
Recommendation
4.7
Credibility
4.5
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!