US embassy cables: The job of the media is not to protect power from embarrassment

It is for governments – not journalists – to guard public secrets, and there is no national jeopardy in WikiLeaks' revelations Is it justified? Should a newspaper disclose virtually all a nation's secret diplomatic communication, illegally downloaded by one of its citizens? The reporting in tomorrow's Guardian of the first of a selection of 250,000 US state department cables marks a recasting of modern diplomacy. Clearly, there is no longer such a ... Full Story »

Posted by Subramanya Sastry - via Google News (Media), NewsRack (Pakistan), AllTop, The Guardian (US), NewsRack (Afghanistan), Johan Jessen (t), Alex Williams (f), Jon Mitchell (f), Fabrice Florin (f)
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Subramanya Sastry - Nov 28, 2010 - 12:19 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Joey Baker - Nov 29, 2010 - 6:08 AM PST
Joey Baker
4.1
by Joey Baker - Nov. 29, 2010

Great analysis of the accusation that Wikileaks is a terrorist organization.

wo backup checks were applied. The US government was told in advance the areas or themes covered, and “representations” were invited in return. These were ... More »

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Chris Finnie
3.9
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 29, 2010

He makes some very interesting and thought-provoking arguments. Not much support for any of them. But, hey, it's an opinion piece.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
4.3
by Patricia L'Herrou - Dec. 3, 2010

this is a well-respected paper,the guardian, establishing its justification for publishing the u.s. embassy cables coming from wikileaks. it is cogent in putting the u.s. in the center of events which run the world at this moment. the power and purpose of the press is being served here. the writer also points out the differences in revelations between the previous war logs from wikileaks and the information contained in these cables.

the guardian put its reputation on the line, and its justifications are reasonable. presumably it will make money from this, yes, but, this represents to me the power and purpose of the press-- to inform the people, and with regard to the level of damage which could be done. in this country we need much more courage in our media than we but rarely get.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.9
by Fred Gatlin - Nov. 28, 2010

This is an informative and thoughtful commentary. There is a fine line between what the public should know and what they need not know. This commentary shows the dilemma well.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Sirajul Islam
4.0
by Sirajul Islam - Dec. 3, 2010

Yes, this is good journalism, and a balanced opinion piece. But newspapers also bear responsibility to reveal if adequately sourced. Actually, the electronic archive of embassy dispatches from around the world was allegedly declassified by a US soldier and passed to WikiLeaks. They made it available to the Guardian, The New York Times, Der Spiegel in Germany, Le Monde in France and El País in Spain. All of them, showed restraint, and published extracts from the most significant cables, but didn't reveal the dataset into the public domain, or published names that would endanger innocent individuals.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Randy Morrow
3.6
by Randy Morrow - Nov. 28, 2010

(comment refers to full article) More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Mary Hartney
4.0
by Mary Hartney - Dec. 3, 2010

America’s foreign policy is revealed as a slave to rightwing drift, terrified of a bomb exploding abroad or of a pro-Israeli congressman at home. More »

See Full Review » (4 answers)
James Canning
4.7
by James Canning - Dec. 9, 2010

Simon Jenkins gets it right about the latest leaks. And he of course is correct that it gives outsiders and inside view of the disastrous course of American decision-making in the Middle East.

Jeenkins compares US policies in the Middle East to the Titanic after it hit the iceberg and was en route to the bottom of the sea. On the other hand, he says we all can be grateful for the chance to see the disaster unfolding, before it is too late. I agree with him completely on this score.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Phillip Neuharth
3.9
by Phillip Neuharth - Nov. 28, 2010

Mr. Jenkins does a fine job in raising questions about the propriety of offering up sensitive state information to the public. For him, the current state of world affairs certainly warrants at least a partial airing of diplomatic 'laundry'. Well written and relevant considering the state of foreign policy the world finds itself in.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
paul steinmiller
3.8
by paul steinmiller - Dec. 2, 2010

this is a good article but it seems like only having one source for this information even though it is a viable source makes it more of speculation then truth when these things are leaked and they report them in the media. Additionally its irresponsible of a journalist because who's truly to know if the document leaked is really true and what is actually happening in the government.

See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story (1)Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 13 reviews (53% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.8
Insight
4.1
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
2.5
Originality
3.9
Relevance
4.1
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.1
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.1
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!