Shell Faces Trial Over Nigerian Crimes Against Humanity Claims

Shell faces a trial May 26 in Manhattan federal court of a lawsuit by three alleged victims of attacks and relatives of seven activists killed from 1990 to 1995, including the writer Ken Saro-Wiwa. The plaintiffs claim Shell’s Nigerian unit assisted the government in the abuse and murder of opponents of the company’s operations in the Niger Delta. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

See All Reviews »

Review

Marsha Iverson
3.7
by Marsha Iverson - May. 7, 2009

Solid look at this pending case, the financial interests in the Niger Delta, and the odds against the plaintiffs. What's missing is any representation of the actual results of more than 40 years of oil extraction on the land, air, water, and people of the Niger Delta.

I would like to see a follow-up by Glovin--I'm impressed with his work.

If prior trials are a guide, the plaintiffs face an uphill battle. A Birmingham, Alabama, jury ruled in July that Drummond Ltd., a U.S. coal producer, wasn’t liable for the deaths of union leaders at a company mine in Colombia. In December a San Francisco jury cleared Chevron Corp. of responsibility for the 1998 deaths, shootings and torture of Nigerian protesters.

Jennifer Green, a lawyer for the plaintiffs against Shell, said her clients are chiefly concerned about the company’s accountability. She declined to speculate on possible damages. “It’s holding Shell responsible for what Shell did,” said Green, of the not-for-profit Center for Constitutional Rights in New York.

Shell Comments The Hague-based company, Europe’s largest oil producer, denies any wrongdoing. The company didn’t encourage or advocate “any act of violence,” according to a statement. A verdict against Shell might prompt some investors to sell shares because they don’t want to be affiliated with a company found responsible for rights violations, said Gudmund Halle Isfeldt, an Oslo-based analyst at DnB NOR ASA.

See All Reviews »

Marsha's Rating

Overall
3.7

Good
from 16 answers
Quality
3.6
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »