Obama promises spending boost for science

President Barack Obama bolstered his lofty promises to US scientists on Monday, saying he would push through an historic increase in research and development funding. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 30, 2009 - 4:50 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 30, 2009 - 4:50 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
3.9
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 30, 2009
See Full Review » (9 answers)
Norman Rogers
2.0
by Norman Rogers - May. 2, 2009

Given Obama's great interest in windmills and other non solutions we can't expect much worthwhile to come out of a highly politicized science. There are great opportunities for nuclear energy research. We may be sure that the Obama administration will neglect this.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Dennis R Keeler
4.1
by Dennis R Keeler - Apr. 30, 2009

The author used credible sources that were providing supporting and skeptical points of view, thus giving s balanced story.

As a retiree from the chemical research business, I can attest to the value that companies place on research tax credits and the positive impact they have on internal funding of "blue sky" research.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Zachary Andrews
3.6
by Zachary Andrews - Apr. 30, 2009

This is goof journalism because of the percentages they incorporate into the story showing in depth statistics and increases/decreases.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Kay L. Colley
3.7
by Kay L. Colley - May. 5, 2009

This lacks some of the depth and context needed for an audience that aren't science wonks. Such large figures are beyond most people's comprehension.

To keep science on the radar screen for the general public, more reporters outside of the trade press will need to tackle these issues and make them understandable.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kristina Colyer
4.3
by Kristina Colyer - Apr. 30, 2009

This is quality journalism because it presents the story and facts, leaving out personal opinion. Its timely and relevant to everyone.

Although I agree with an increase in science funding, I disagree that now is the time to do it. The government should be focusing more on the economy, housing crisis, etc. We are already spending $12 billion a day, why dig the hole even deeper for something lower on the priority list?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Emily McELroy
3.7
by Emily McELroy - Apr. 30, 2009

i think its good we are putting more money towards scientific research

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 10 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.6
Sourcing
4.0
Style
2.5
Context
3.5
Depth
3.4
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!