Short View: Obama's first 100 days

Financial Times by John Authers | Apr. 29, 2009 (Special Report)

(Video) A comparison with FDR's first 100 days Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Business
Topics: U.S. Economy, Obama Administration
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 29, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Kaizar Campwala (review), Fabrice Florin (review), Derek Hawkins (review), Jade Sheldong (review), Lukas Eggen (review), Lindsey Gross (review), Manfred Ostrowski (review), Jena Greenburg (review), Gerald E. Martinson (review), Megan (review)
Content Type: Video
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 29, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT
Related Comments: Obama Administration (3)

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.5
 by Derek Hawkins - Apr. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.5
 by Fabrice Florin - Apr. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.2
 by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 29, 2009
Kaizar posted this story.
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Manfred Ostrowski
3.5
 by Manfred Ostrowski - Apr. 30, 2009

As it was to be expected, one sees quality with bias.

Comments of Financial Times do not really offer a clearcut way out of financial crisis, so I wonder wether economists really know what would be the best thing to do for the government..

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Lindsey Gross
3.1
 by Lindsey Gross - Apr. 30, 2009

It is Informative and it gives an general outlook on Obama and the Economy.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Lukas Eggen
3.6
 by Lukas Eggen - Apr. 29, 2009

Yes it is quality journalism, it is a very interesting way of looking at Obama's term. I like that it was video, I think that it makes it much more effective in this case than print.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Jena Greenburg
3.7
 by Jena Greenburg - Apr. 30, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Gerald E. Martinson
3.0
 by Gerald E. Martinson - Apr. 30, 2009

I would not have used this comparison.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Jade Sheldong
3.6
 by Jade Sheldong - Apr. 29, 2009

yes because it is very factual although the reporter is a little boring

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.0
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.7
Depth
3.4
Enterprise
3.3
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.3
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!