Swine flu creates controversy on Twitter

"This is a good example of why [Twitter is] headed in that wrong direction, because it's just propagating fear amongst people as opposed to seeking actual solutions or key information," said Brennon Slattery, a contributing writer for PC World. "The swine flu thing came really at the crux of a media revolution."

Twitter's popularity has exploded in recent months, and Slattery said it's a new development that a wide number of people would turn to ... Full Story »

Posted by Kelly Garrett

See All Reviews »

Review

Katie Gilmartin
4.2
by Katie Gilmartin - Apr. 29, 2009

The article serves its purpose, to inform people about the negative aspects of Twitter. I would say this is good journalism because even though most of the article is about how Twitter should not be trusted, the author still includes some information that is pro Twitter. The sources used are also credible.

I really liked reading this article because there are so many online sites that people can go to and search about medical problems which actually do more harm than good. People look up certain ailments or diseases and they think that they have it because of what they read, but they may be reading false information. I think this article addresses that in a classy way by not bashing Twitter completely but making it known that people should not take every piece of advice/information that Twitter provides.

See All Reviews »

Katie's Rating

Overall
4.2

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »