Informative overview of how Obama's approval ratings have changed over time, comparing findings from ABC/Washington Post, Gallup, Pollster and Rasmussen. Based on this factual evidence, the author offers a reasonable analysis of why their results differ, while observing that overall approval percentages have declined a bit, and disapproval has increased.

I'm not sure it's entirely appropriate to judge a president purely based upon their approval ratings, especially in the first 100 days. The article describes it as the "honeymoon effect" wearing off, and seems to assert that polls - many of them biased - are a good measure of judgment for a new president. It's factual about the polls, but not very deep or quality writing, overall.

While this is a straight forward analysis of polls outlining changing public opinion on Obama's first 100 days, there is very little original reporting. Charts and graphs illuminate poll results, however, there isn't a single quote from polling staff members or voters about their reactions to Obama's job performance.

This article stuck strictly to statistics. I found there to be no form of a bias oppinion. It was very informative giving very helpful information. Graphs were also displayed to help explain their comparision.