David Broder and media culpability for Bush crimes

What Broder states today as fact (that the Bush presidency is "one of the darkest chapters of American history") is almost verbatim that which, when it mattered, when it was happening, he vehemently and repeatedly denied -- and, of course, given that he works in the most accountability-free profession of all (establishment punditry), he does not even have the minimal honesty to acknowledge that. Like so many of his colleagues, Broder played a critical ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

See All Reviews »

Review

Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Apr. 27, 2009

Greenwald argues persuasively that the big corporate media punditry supported or enabled the bush war crimes and trashing of the constitution.

Bush officials didn’t commit these crimes by themselves. Virtually the entire Washington establishment supported or at least enabled most of it

So when these media and political elites are defending Bush officials, mitigating their crimes, and arguing that they shouldn’t be held accountable, they’re actually defending themselves.

People who bear culpability in the commission of destructive and criminal acts always oppose investigations and accountability — i.e., what they’ll call “looking backwards” or “retribution.” They’re the last people whose opinions we ought to be seeking on that question.

When poor and ordinary Americans who commit crimes are prosecuted and imprisoned, that is Justice. When the same thing is done to Washington elites, that is Ugly Retribution.

See All Reviews »

Dwight's Rating

Overall
4.6

Very good
from 16 answers
Quality
4.7
Information
4.0
Insight
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
5.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »