Big costs weigh on troop debate

While President Obama's decision about sending more troops to Afghanistan is primarily a military one, it also has substantial budget implications...

even if Obama chooses a lower troop commitment, Afghanistan's new costs could wash out the projected $26 billion expected to be saved in 2010 from withdrawing troops from Iraq. And the overall military budget could reach $734 billion, or 10 percent more than the peak of $667 billion under the Bush administration.

Such an escalation in military spending would be a politically volatile issue for Obama at a time when the government budget deficit is ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 0 (as of 2009-11-15)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Nov 15, 2009 - 2:29 PM PST
Reviewed by: Dwight Rousu (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Nov 15, 2009 - 2:33 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.1
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 15, 2009

The article presents long-delayed discussion of the immense cost of this unnecessary invasion and occupation, while including opinions of some who wish to escalate the military aspect while cutting government spending.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

not enough reviews
from 1 review (11% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
5.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
3.4
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!