The politics of avoidance

America's budget problem boils down to a simple question: How much will we let programs for the elderly displace other government functions - national defense, education, transportation and many others - and raise taxes to levels that would, almost certainly, reduce economic growth? Full Story »

Posted by Barry Grossheim
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 1 (as of 2010-11-22)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Barry Grossheim - Nov 22, 2010 - 7:39 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Barry Grossheim - Nov 22, 2010 - 7:43 AM PST
Chris Finnie
1.8
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 22, 2010

His arguments are based on some unproven assumptions. First, lower taxes do not lead to an improved economy. Ireland has one of the lowest corporate tax rates in Europe, and much lower than the U.S. But its economy is in deep trouble. Higher taxes do not depress the economy. Taxes on high wage earners were high during the post-WW II era and it was a boom time. Ditto for the Clinton era. And, though he's right that there are a lot of baby boomers approaching retirement, that's not really the problem. The problem is that the government has borrowed the money we paid in during our working years to finance the federal deficit. Remember Al Gore and his lockbox? Everybody laughed. But he was right.

How much will we let programs for the elderly displace other government functions More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Naomi Isler
4.0
by Naomi Isler - Nov. 22, 2010

I'm not sure it's particularly insightful or informative, but probably should be read to see where some current economic thinkers are going. I'm not sure I totally trust his figures, One problem is that he lumps Medicaid, a program providing medical care for low income people with Medicare, the program for the elderly. And he does not deal with the massive annual increases in health care costs that affect everyone.

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Jon Mitchell
3.5
by Jon Mitchell - Nov. 22, 2010

I think this is actually a pretty good boiling-down of the interests in the budget debate, but there are some factual distortions. When the author says "the richest 5 percent already pay about 45 percent of federal taxes," this is not an informative statistic. It measures "taxes" as a function of absolute revenue, so of COURSE the wealthiest people pay the most; it does nothing to illuminate the proportions or nature of the federal tax BURDEN on Americans.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Barry Grossheim
4.0
by Barry Grossheim - Nov. 22, 2010

A very good look at the U.S. budget deficit problem and the political third rail issues that must be addressed. social security, defense spending and taxes.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Cecilia Akuffo
2.5
by Cecilia Akuffo - Nov. 22, 2010

As opinion, it succeeds in presenting a point of view, which although gives the impression of balance leans in favor of a more conservative view point.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 6 reviews (53% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.4
Insight
2.8
Style
3.7
Context
3.3
Depth
2.0
Expertise
2.7
Originality
2.7
Relevance
3.7
Responsibility
2.5
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!