What Good Is Wall Street?

Much of what investment bankers do is socially worthless.

For a long time, economists and policymakers have accepted the financial industry’s appraisal of its own worth, ignoring the market failures and other pathologies that plague it. Even after all that has happened, there is a tendency in Congress and the White House to defer to Wall Street because what happens there, befuddling as it may be to outsiders, is essential to the country’s prosperity. Finally, dissidents like Paul Woolley are questioning this ... Full Story »

Posted by Jon Mitchell - via Umair Haque, Memeorandum, New Yorker, Ray Nichols (t), Donica Mensing (t), Malorie Jae Lucich (t), Johan Jessen (t), Peter Avalos (t), Ellie Kesselman (t), Salvador Sala (t), George Moga (t), Joey Baker (t), Gian Antelles (f), Jon Mitchell (f), Alex Williams (f), Allan Foster (f), Tobie Openshaw (f)

See All Reviews »

Review

Joey Baker
4.0
by Joey Baker - Nov. 26, 2010

Lord Adair Turner, the chairman of Britain’s top financial watchdog, the Financial Services Authority, has described much of what happens on Wall Street and in other financial centers as “socially useless activity”—a comment that suggests it could be eliminated without doing any damage to the economy. In a recent article titled “What Do Banks Do?,” which appeared in a collection of essays devoted to the future of finance, Turner pointed out that although certain financial activities were genuinely valuable, others generated revenues and profits without delivering anything of real worth—payments that economists refer to as rents. “It is possible for financial activity to extract rents from the real economy rather than to deliver economic value,” Turner wrote. “Financial innovation … may in some ways and under some circumstances foster economic value creation, but that needs to be illustrated at the level of specific effects: it cannot be asserted a priori.”

“I realized we were acting rationally and optimally,” he said. “The clients were acting rationally and optimally. And the outcome was a complete Horlicks.” Financial markets, far from being efficient, as most economists and policymakers at the time believed, were grossly inefficient. “And once you recognize that markets are inefficient a lot of things change.”

See All Reviews »

Joey's Rating

Overall
4.0

Good
from 14 answers
Quality
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »