Why our obsession with climate change may end up destroying biodiversity

Now, being green is all about greenhouse gases: Neighborhood moms are more apt to fret over food miles than felled forests; organic cattle farmers are more interested in offsetting the methane coming from cow burps than pondering squished tadpoles in hoof prints. Even scientists have grown bored with question of habitat loss, tweaking their grant proposals to emphasize the climate angle no matter how tenuous the connection. Saving the Amazon is so 1980s. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Dwight Rousu
3.1
by Dwight Rousu - Apr. 23, 2009

Borrell expresses frustration and some anger that aspects of the ecosystem do not seem to be getting the degree of attention they deserve relative to global climate change. While he may have worthy points, they are not cogently posed. He seems to be shooting friends instead of expanding the circle.

Population control should get more attention than either species protection or climate change; it is causative. If Obama were advocating a carbon tax, it would be better than cap and trade, which displaces the problems as Borrell complains.

See All Reviews »

Dwight's Rating

Overall
3.1

Average
from 13 answers
Quality
3.1
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Style
2.0
Context
3.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »