Use Energy, Get Rich and Save the Planet

As their wealth grows, people consume more energy, but they move to more efficient and cleaner sources — from wood to coal and oil, and then to natural gas and nuclear power, progressively emitting less carbon per unit of energy. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 21, 2009 - 8:21 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Apr 21, 2009 - 7:19 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.4
by Fabrice Florin - Apr. 21, 2009

Intriguing but controversial prediction that human environmental impact may decrease as countries get richer. The author offers some factual evidence and interesting context to back his argument, but it remains largely speculative.

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Mike LaBonte
2.7
by Mike LaBonte - Apr. 21, 2009

Even though journalism and science both use methods to approach the truth, it can get ugly when journalists try to be scientists. This is based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve theory, which has some validity. However, the story is rife with unsupported assumptions. There are links, but they point to a relatively small number of unique sources. This is thought provoking but not balanced.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Cristen Drummond
3.1
by Cristen Drummond - Apr. 21, 2009

It seems more opinionated then bias. The journalist is presuming that people should continue to use energy and technology because eventually that will lead to wealth. Once people have money, then the environment can begin to become "green." Does incorporate facts and studies but focuses more on his opinion on what people o earth should do before cleaning it up.

I believe people can do their part to clean the environment even if they aren't wealthy. Wealth only means you have more resources to help. However, simple tasks such as recycling don't cost anything and can also help someone make money. While the concept seems easy, it is still hard for some people to grasp. I do believe though if the world begins to recycle, the earth will become a greener place.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 21, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Kathie Taylor
3.9
by Kathie Taylor - Apr. 21, 2009

As part of the larger portfolio of stories, this story would make more sense. The author only quotes one source. He explains a lot of the theories behind his reasoning without attributing the source of his research. One would have to read the entire group of stories to understand the issues fully.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Charli West
3.0
by Charli West - Apr. 21, 2009

It's interesting to see where we've come from in 1970 to today for Earth day. This story itself focuses on the increase of Environmental Kuznets Curve and how far along our country is compare to more poor countries around the world.I think this story is news worthy for the tactic is uses to bring a reader with well-round information about Kuznets.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
3.3
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
3.3
Context
3.3
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.3
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!