Does Terrorism Matter in Afghanistan and Pakistan?

I don’t think Walt’s analysis fully reflects the degree to which Afghanistan and Pakistan have become a unified problem, a problem which strikes me as being so maddeningly complex that it doesn't present any sort of clear options for the U.S. Say the U.S. were to do as Walt recommends and scale back its footprint in Afghanistan, and halt all military involvement in Pakistan (essentially predator strikes and training missions) I’m not sure I see how ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 10, 2009 - 8:14 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Kaizar Campwala (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 10, 2009 - 8:39 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
3.3
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 10, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

not enough reviews
from 1 review (10% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Information
2.0
Insight
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
2.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • We're From the US Government, and We're Here to Help

    (Blog Post) Even if we succeed in stamping out the safe havens in Afghanistan and Pakistan, terrorists could merely relocate. If multi-decade, multi-trillion dollar campaigns are ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
  • Does the threat from al Qaeda justify a major escalation in Central Asia?

    Does the threat of international terrorism -- specifically al Qaeda -- justify a costly, long-term engagement in Afghanistan and Pakistan? President Obama and his advisors ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala