Some things cry out for explanation. Like finding $90,000 in marked bills in a Congressman's freezer. Or finding out that a blue-chip lawyer who held one of the most important jobs in the nation was willing to risk his career, his livelihood, and his liberty to steal, hide, and destroy classified documents. Full Story »
Posted by Kaizar Campwala
The evident anti-Clinton bias in this blog makes it more difficult to assess the credibility of serious allegations against Sandy Berger. It's undeniable that Berger deliberately illegally took classified materials away with him from the National Archives, in conjunction with the work of the 9-11 Commission. It's unknown exactly what this material was, and why it was so important that Berger went to some lengths to obtain it. This is an important matter which is worthy of further investigation. The rest consists of pure speculation, attacks on Clinton's reputation, and boosterism of Rudy Giuliani. The article would have been stronger if the author stuck to the facts and asked the obvious questions.
operative word here should be "copies" of the report. Nowhere does it say that he took the originals and destroyed them, just three of five copies.
Retrieving Comments
