G-20 Summit Communique: Implications for the Global Poor

The problem, as many Europeans see it, is that the U.S. stimulus package had to be as large as it was, and so much of it had to be devoted to social safety-net programs simply because the United States was not carrying its fair share of the global burden of putting in place programs that would ensure economic stability in the first place. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 3, 2009 - 7:50 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Apr 3, 2009 - 10:27 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Patricia L'Herrou
3.8
by Patricia L'Herrou - Apr. 3, 2009

the story points out a happy ending for what might have been a thorn in the eu-us summit goal agreements. the news here is that additional monies to the imf may forecast a true turn-around in the u.s. policies regarding developing countries' needs aligning them more with europe's, benefits for the global economic crisis for this action are pointed out.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 3, 2009

targeting developing nations rather than developed nations for more spending may have more systemic benefit for the same reason that increased safety-net expenditures ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
3.5
Fairness
2.5
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.3
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!