Is Hillary The New Kerry?

The most remarkable point about those polls are that the top two candidates barely have a single term of national office combined. Obama has only served two years of his first Senate term, and Edwards only served four years before essentially withdrawing from his duties to campaign for President in 2003 and 2004. Edwards declined to run for re-election, as polls showed that he would lose to Richard Burr handily.

Now, however, the neophytes have ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Topics: Presidential Election 2008
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jan 12, 2007 - 8:59 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Laura Perkins
1.9
by Laura Perkins - Oct. 1, 2008

This is right wing opinion, nothing more. It fails to explore several counterarguments that could be made, not the least of which is that none of the Democratic candidates are any less experienced than Bush was when he ran in 2000.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Jim Lang
3.4
by Jim Lang - Oct. 1, 2008

A blog post that notes that Hillary Clinton has slipped in the polls in Iowa and New Hampshire relative to John Edwards and Barack Obama then opines as to why and what it means. Just opinion with a heavy bias against Ms. Clinton but interesting speculation.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.7

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
2.7
Fairness
2.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
2.6
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
1.5
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
2.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!