The Orwellian language of Wall Street finds its way to the Treasury Department

In trying to rebrand dodgy financial in­struments, treasury secretaries like Paul­son and Timothy Geithner are continuing a recent tradition. So much of the finance sector's innovation in the past 30 years, it turns out, wasn't developing new stuff, but rather developing new ways of talking about pre-existing stuff. In the 1980s, la­beling risky debt offerings as junk bonds was an intentionally ironic feint (pros knew that the instruments pos­sessed ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Business
Topics: Advertising, Finance
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Mar 29, 2009 - 12:05 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Mar 29, 2009 - 12:05 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Julia Willebrand
3.4
by Julia Willebrand - Apr. 4, 2009

What's not clear in this piece is the extent of the deception involved in reframing toxic/troubled assets as "legacy loans". Since this an opinion piece the author should have made the identity and intention of the culprits clearer.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.4
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Richard McIlnay
4.3
by Richard McIlnay - Mar. 30, 2009

Well written with strong central point which is well developed and exampled

The same bubblespeak can be seen being used in the constant wars we have been engaged in for the last few decades.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Information
4.0
Insight
4.5
Style
4.0
Context
3.7
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
2.5
Originality
4.5
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!