Lindsey Graham Calls For U.S. Strike On Iran

A leading U.S. senator on defense issues says any military strike on Iran to stop its nuclear program must also strive to take out Iran's military capability.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via Google Blogsearch (Politics), Google Blogsearch (World), Falco Guthert (f)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics
Stats Help
# Diggs: 10 (as of 2010-11-07)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Nov 6, 2010 - 10:17 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Nov 7, 2010 - 4:02 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
3.3
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 7, 2010

The reporting show the war-crazy republican attitude surging with their perceived midterm mandate...

war, pestilence, famine, and floods - the plan of the repubs

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Feliuai Ieremia
3.0
by Feliuai Ieremia - Nov. 8, 2010

In terms of social capital, depending on the community the article shows their possible reaction to Graham's call. Conservatives would agree with Graham's argument to destroy Iran's military and Airforce, while Liberals are already against the war and would fight the Conservative argument to keep from spending more money on the military. The journalism just reports what Lindsay Graham said, but there is still bias with only mentioning what the Republicans would say.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
James Canning
4.9
by James Canning - Nov. 7, 2010

Idiot neocon warmonger, Graham is a stooge of the Israel lobby trying to deceive the American people into believing Iran is developing nuclear weapons. The CIA has ZERO intelligence that Iran wants nukes. ZERO.

Graham is an idiot warmongering neocon, of the sort that have inflicted more damage on the US than Osama bin Laden.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Cole Stewart
3.3
by Cole Stewart - Nov. 8, 2010

this is ok journalism as it does have some balance. it is also well sourced. In terms of social capital conservatives would probably want to be harder on Iran as Graham says is necessary, but liberals would most likely not be in support of graham as they are already against the war and do not want the U.S. spending more money than it can afford at the moment

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 4 reviews (23% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.2
Fairness
3.5
Sourcing
3.2
Style
2.5
Context
3.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
2.5
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!