Dangerous Thinking
Inertia in the Face of Accelerating Climate Change
Although a normal and essential part of science, debate is perceived by the public as evidence that IPCC could be wrong. So let's wait until all scientists agree before we alter our behavior. This rationalization arises from a poor understanding of how science functions. Further, it gives the naysayers the same weight as the vast majority of knowledgeable climate scientists -- a very egalitarian approach, but a dangerous one nonetheless. Full Story »
Posted by Kaizar Campwala
This is a great article as it raises awareness of our footprint on this Earth and our collective attitude toward a general denial or refusal to take responsibility for our impact. I think that many of us beleive in the 'not in our lifetime' perspective.The problem is, the denial is so thick that many do not realize that this prespective is misconstrued. The impacts of global warming are within many of our lifetimes. The challange will be the ongoing debate of what is the cause, and can change happen quicker than the destruction?