This article makes its point well, though it does not really speak to how the Dangerous Thinking is to be altered. Probably the most valuable argument presented is that scientists have not yet managed to make their case to the public, and he touches on what they do wrong as well as noting that they are faced with a very communicative opposition. Direct references to things psychological, however, are fairly common knowledge. That said, the case regarding responding to climate change and the dilemma getting it across to the public is made well. What there is to do about that, however, is not much presented.

Interesting report about why most people don't take climate change seriously. The author offers a few reasonable explanations in this short article.

the article points out reasonable causes for why the desire to make energy changes based on awareness of climate change has been slow to reach consensus . bringing up the poor understanding of how science functions and the impact of that seems crucial to the discussion. it has internal cohesion to make its points

This article tries to tell us why people do not believe the climate is changing. It is hard to understand why the public is skeptical on this issue. Any close observer can see changes in the climate if they choose. It is those who refuse to look closely and do not wish to understand science who still does not think the climate has changed.