Copenhagen already a success

There is a huge dysfunction between the way the average voter comes at these issues and the way policy spokespeople in the corporate, environmental NGO and government worlds often do. And at no time is this more visible than when mega climate/carbon events like Copenhagen come around.

Most people are worried that the planet is under a lot of pressure, and many believe the climate is changing as a result. Considerably fewer have examined the ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 14 (as of 2009-11-10)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Nov 10, 2009 - 7:21 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Nov 10, 2009 - 7:22 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kenneth L Salzman, PhD
2.7
by Kenneth L Salzman, PhD - Nov. 10, 2009

This is an opinion piece, but that is not surprising in a blog. The author's assertions about "most people" are never supported by data nor, I suspect, are they very accurate. He raises the concept of a "moral issue" but does not support it well, let alone support the argument that such a thing is swaying the public. His central theme, though, is, itself, unsupported. Was Kyoto a success because after Kyoto there was an increase in climate conscious activity? No support for the contention, either of the presence of an increase or the cause thereof. His title, declaring Copenhagen already a success, is undone by his concluding paragraph. If we are not changing quickly enough, then the actions at Copenhagen can hardly be ... More »

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.2
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 10, 2009

Interesting opinion which suggests that public attitudes towards climate change may be shifting. In this short post, the author points to 'a new moral math' that is leading more people to take simple steps like shopping with reusable bags, even if they don't completely understand the specifics of climate change. Sadly, this piece doesn't offer much factual evidence or independent perspectives to back up the author's speculations.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 3 reviews (54% confidence)
Quality
3.1
Facts
2.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
2.5
Insight
3.0
Style
3.5
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.5
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
1.5
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
1.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Dangerous Thinking

    Although a normal and essential part of science, debate is perceived by the public as evidence that IPCC could be wrong. So let's wait until all scientists agree before we ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
  • The psychology of climate change

    (Blog Post) Organisers of a youth rally told me earlier this year that climate change was the activist issue for their generation and that young people would turn out to protest in record ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins