The Dirt on Clean Coal

Critics argue that "clean coal" means anything the industry wants it to, pointing out that of the country's 616 coal plants, none are carbon-free or close to it. The viability of an environmentally sustainable future for coal is questionable, and so is the industry's commitment to cleaning itself up. The Center for American Progress recently released a report showing that the country's biggest coal companies have spent only a fraction of their ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Mar 28, 2009 - 12:56 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Nov 18, 2009 - 11:44 AM PST
Gary Clark
5.0
by Gary Clark - Mar. 28, 2009

This argumentative piece begins with the dangers the coal industry imposes on localities and the world at large, It then continues with a rich history of the industry's advertising strategy, and details of the politics, dollars, and personalities at play. The future of coal is unclear and politically turbulent, luring fiscal hawks, and repulsing greens. Clean coal (CCS) is mostly a figment of Big Coal's PR campaign, but it has tremendous appeal as a safe haven for political fence-straddlers.

Many of the PR firms and lobbyists are the very same who fronted for the tobacco companies, and the analogy of clean coal and healthy cigarettes is striking. It is time to give up smoking. Period.

Venners has been hearing about the promise of a pollution-free future for coal since he joined the National Coal Council in 1984.“I’m 61,” he says, ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.2
by Fred Gatlin - Mar. 29, 2009

This article falls into a political news trap. It is so shrill and accusing that fairness becomes a question. It seems the author’s position is anyone who supports coal is slick willing to say anything and anyone who opposes use of coal is a saint.

I understand that major coal and electric companies are not anxious to spend money to lessen CO2 output, but any effort to lessen CO2 is better than no improvement

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 18, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Russell Grissom
2.7
by Russell Grissom - Mar. 29, 2009

Very biased in his approach and does not include other uses of coal - such as coal gasification such as the methods that have been developed by AIE in Italy. I do agree with some of the points but I feel that it is not a balanced piece. But what journalism is nowadays?

There are ways to "extract" the energy in coal without burning it - however they are very advanced technologically. Well, actually, the Russians have been using the technology since the 1970s but when Ronald Raygun entered office the USA /USSR co-operative programme was terminated for two basic reasons: The technology would only use 1/4th the amount of mined coal to produce the same amount of energy and oil was so inexpensive that we really (except for President Carter and the DOE) ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 5 reviews (59% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
3.8
Fairness
2.8
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.2
Style
4.2
Context
4.0
Depth
4.2
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!