Bush's Iraq Speech

The President's facts check out, though he leaves out some inconvenient ones.

President Bush's sobering address to the nation laid out his plan to rescue Iraq by sending in more troops at a time when polls show the American people want just the opposite. Is his approach a significant change of course? Will it work? We leave that to others to chew over. What we can say is that he was right on the facts he cited, although there were some notable omissions. While he highlighted the planned distribution of oil revenues to the Iraqi ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S.
Topics: War in Iraq
Member Tags: Annenberg Foundation, Reader's Digest, al Maliki, Kurd
Editorial Help

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Joseph F Dunphy MBA MFP
2.6
by Joseph F Dunphy MBA MFP - Oct. 1, 2008

The article seems fine at first glance, but upon analysis it reveals its true conservative bias. The biggest red-flag for the average reader is that the source of the story is the Annenberg Foundation, and the late Walter Annenberg was one of the co-founders of Reader's Digest, which goes to some 50 million plus homes in America, making his media reach truly part of an empire. Annenberg was a supporter of Republican politics in California, so a friend and financial supporter of Nixon, etc. So we are at least alert that this is sourced from a right-wing funded think tank. As to the actual piece itself, the focus on the president's factual accuracy is fair game, but then they actually stop short of analyzing what the real facts ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Joseph Duemer
3.3
by Joseph Duemer - Oct. 1, 2008

Factcheck faults politicians for leaving out "key facts," but their definition of a fact is rather narrow. The key fact behind the president's speech is that he elected to attack a country that posed no direct or immediate threat to the US and he did so with such sloppy incompetence that the US Army and Marines are now being ground up by the Iraqi insurgency even as the president pushes his chips all in trying to pull something that he can describe as victory out of what everyone else sees as crushing defeat. That is the "key fact" left out of this piece, but which loomed large to anyone listening to George Bush's speech the other night.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Leo Romero
5.0
by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008

You can always count on FactCheck to try to get to the whole truth, without mercy to either side of any mealymouth, and here they did it again.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabrice Florin
5.0
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008

Once again, FactCheck provides an invaluable public service, by verifying the facts behind President Bush's latest speech. Thoroughly resarched, fair, balanced and factual. Their analysis also points out what's missing from that speech, which is just as important as what's included. Well done.

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Paul Miller
3.0
by Paul Miller - Oct. 1, 2008

Sadly "w" just doesn't get it and obediently our elected Congress marches to his tune fearful of exercising its justifible constitutional power of oversight. Why ... in the nations belt-way their all beholdiing to the same master - "corporate" funding, money the mother'$ milk of politics. Until "we" - that's you and me - choose to hold their feet to the fire, nothing will change.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.7
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.7
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.3
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.3
Context
3.6
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
3.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!