Psychologist Tackles Psychology of Liberals, Conservatives

Liberals and conservatives conceive of morality in decidedly different ways. Jonathan Haidt has mapped out their competing ethical universes in hopes they can learn to peacefully coexist. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 1 (as of 2009-11-09)
# Tweets: 0 (as of 2009-11-09)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Nov 9, 2009 - 12:21 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Nov 9, 2009 - 12:22 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Patricia Blochowiak
2.5
by Patricia Blochowiak - Nov. 9, 2009

Starts by talking about Haidt's bias against certain liberal opinions and goes on as if that bias neither existed nor had an effect on his research. Vague about the actual research. Lots of other people's philosophies mentioned.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.7
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 14, 2009

Thoughtful report about moral differences between conservatives and liberals, based on University of Virginia professor Jonathan Haidt's work. This in-depth article provides good factual information and cites independent perspectives about Haidt's framework of political morality. Very helpful analysis of some of the root causes behind America's culture wars.

Haidt’s research reveals that liberals feel strongly about the first two dimensions — preventing harm and ensuring fairness — but often feel little, or even feel ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dwight Rousu
3.8
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 14, 2009

Any five point model of human morality has to be a simplification of reality, but some of the observations are interesting. In dealing with political and psychological morality, he omits much of the ethics aspects from philosophy.

the Republicans’ tendency to blindly follow their leader proved disastrous over the past eight years. “Look how horribly the GOP ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 5 reviews (70% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
3.6
Fairness
3.8
Information
4.0
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
3.4
Style
3.4
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.4
Depth
3.6
Enterprise
3.6
Expertise
3.0
Originality
1.0
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Why Are the Loudest Political Voices the Most Extreme?

    Those bombastic self-appointed spokespersons who rant from both the political right and left are likely driven by the conviction that their extreme views are shared by the ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • Birth of a Notion: Implicit Social Cognition and the "Birther" Movement

    A black president, however, causes great cognitive dissonance in some. But members of the “birther” movement have found a clever solution: Obama isn’t really president! ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
  • How the Brain Reveals Why We Buy

    Neuromarketing is a young and growing field–some won’t even admit that it is a field yet–that is striving to reveal the inner mechanisms of our consumer behavior. You ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • The Biggest Roadblock to Change May Be in Our Minds

    When you step back from the specifics of the health care debate — as well as the rancor surrounding it — an odd contradiction emerges. Fairly or not, insurance companies ...
    Posted by Fabrice Florin