Why Are the Loudest Political Voices the Most Extreme?

Those bombastic self-appointed spokespersons who rant from both the political right and left are likely driven by the conviction that their extreme views are shared by the majority of the members of their political party, but they are probably wrong, according to new research. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 20 (as of 2009-11-09)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Nov 9, 2009 - 12:08 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Nov 9, 2009 - 12:09 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
3.0
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 9, 2009

A somewhat shallow and hypothetical stroll around trying to answer the title question.

From the comments, from jrod: Typical psychobabble! A story about a study, laced with probably, maybe, and suggests, ending with a debunking of their own conclusions ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.6
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 9, 2009

Interesting article about recent studies at Stanford and Ohio State suggesting that political extremists tend to think they speak for the masses. Though it is presented as an opinion, this story provides reasonable factual evidence from multiple sources to back its points.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Michael Todd
2.9
by Michael Todd - Nov. 9, 2009

I like that the piece marshals some research to support the questions it addresses, and I'm intrigued that there may be some proof to the intuitive assumption that many extremists routinely believe they represent a majority, but I think by asking "Why are the loudest political voices we hear coming from the most extreme sources?" the piece goes askew since lots of people are demanding center stage, and it's the person handing out megaphones who determines who gets heard best.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 5 reviews (75% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Information
4.0
Insight
3.2
Style
3.2
Context
3.0
Expertise
3.8
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.5
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Birth of a Notion: Implicit Social Cognition and the "Birther" Movement

    A black president, however, causes great cognitive dissonance in some. But members of the “birther” movement have found a clever solution: Obama isn’t really president! ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
  • Psychologist Tackles Psychology of Liberals, Conservatives

    Liberals and conservatives conceive of morality in decidedly different ways. Jonathan Haidt has mapped out their competing ethical universes in hopes they can learn to ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
  • The Biggest Roadblock to Change May Be in Our Minds

    When you step back from the specifics of the health care debate — as well as the rancor surrounding it — an odd contradiction emerges. Fairly or not, insurance companies ...
    Posted by Fabrice Florin