Frankly, I found this piece somewhat dissatisfying on an intellectual level, despite the introduction of some new research data. The author associates the "unnnaturalness" of evolutionary thinking with the idea that evolutionary thinking must therefore be more advanced. And he uses this association to support his obvious prejudice that creationist thinking is regressive. What is missing from this facile analysis is starkly evident--he refers to "Darwin’s mindless machine of natural selection" without considering the possibility that observed evolutionary progress, though mutation and natural selection, might at times have been a guided process. Of course the author would probably maintain that this simply proves his point--that most of us will remain hopeless creationists because we aren't willing to expend the necessary energy to overcome childlike thinking.